General first comparison of 4 of the most popular 6S Racing packs.
This is not a super detailed and measured scientific study like the Bardwell would do, but a racers opinion after a full 30 pack day of flying which work best for 6S racing.
General first comparison of 4 of the most popular 6S Racing packs.
This is not a super detailed and measured scientific study like the Bardwell would do, but a racers opinion after a full 30 pack day of flying which work best for 6S racing.
First, also im getting the rdq 6s batts for my first build, cant wait to try them
Batteries are Life!
Chnl doesn’t make a 100c 6s?
Dude… I need batteries. 1s, 2s, 3s, … 6s… LOL Banggood wasn’t sending them to Brazil for about 6 months… Just bought 3 yesterday!
About the 6s packs, well… That was expected. 4s packs are used for a long time, the companies could test and make them better a lot… The 6s packs are just starting, so… You know. ?
Anyway… Merry Christmas and happy new year! For you and your family! ?
Good video dude. It’s always helpful to share your personal experiences with a product. These results make pretty good sense to me. The CNHL is always strictly a practice pack for me personally. I don’t find that it puts out less power (ie wattage) but I definitely find them to be WAY short on capacity compared to pyro packs (150mah+ difference). Almost always when I fell out of the sky racing 2 minutes this season, I was using a CNHL 1250 HV charged when it happened.
It also makes sense to me that the pyro packs performed the same for you as the RDQ packs. I’m 99% sure they’re actually the same packs, produced by the same manufacturer, so it makes sense they would give you similar results.
Keep up the awesome work man, you’re killing it putting out all this content.
RDQ is a disappointment for me. I bought a few to give me an extra bit of time on track in the first few practise runs, but they sag worse than my older 1000 CNHL, and I still don’t get any more track time.